Khalistani Row: Not only Britain, Canada and Australia are also ahead in giving shelter to anti-India Khalistanis. There was a clash during the so-called Khalistan referendum by demolishing three Hindu temples in Australia.
Image Credit source: Twitter
Indian High Commission in London, UK Khalistanis insulted the tricolor. This incident has been carried out when the police in India arrested Khalistani supporters.Amritpal Singh Started taking action against After this whole matter, the Government of India Britain Summoned the High Commissioner of However, even after this, the UK government did not take any such action, so that it could be decided that such an incident would not happen again. After this incident, Khalistanis have now attacked the Indian Embassy in San Francisco, USA.
Not only Britain, Canada and Australia are also ahead in giving shelter to anti-India Khalistanis. There was a clash during the so-called Khalistan referendum by demolishing three Hindu temples in Australia.
In such a situation, there is a question that after all countries like Britain and Australia claim good relations with India. They leave no stone unturned to welcome Prime Minister Narendra Modi, then why do they give place to anti-India Khalistani supporters in the country. Why don’t you take strict action after Khalistani activities. Let us understand the reasons for this…
Green signal given for picketing
According to Articles 10 and 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights, there is a free hand to protest in Britain. People here can protest openly under human rights. If they did not harm any local person during the demonstration, till then action would not have been taken. If the performance is uncontrolled then action can be taken. However, the police administration refrains from taking very strict action in such cases because the issue of human rights is raised when this happens.
Is Britain taking revenge?
Even after insulting the Tricolor in Britain, there is no sense of revenge behind not taking strict action against the Khalistanis. The foundation of which was laid during the tenure of Boris Johnson. According to media reports, when Boris Johnson was the Prime Minister, Britain started changing its stand on the demand of Khalistan. From his stand, it was being speculated that Britain was not becoming favorable to the Khalistanis. Western countries opposed Russia after the attack in Ukraine, but India did not oppose Russia. In such a situation, it is being said that not taking strict action by Britain on the recent act of Khalistanis is like taking revenge from India.
Khalistanis brought down the tricolor
#WATCH | United Kingdom: Khalistani elements attempt to pull down the Indian flag but the flag was rescued by Indian security personnel at the High Commission of India, London.
(Source: MATV, London)
(Note: Abusive language at the end) pic.twitter.com/QP30v6q2G0
— ANI (@ANI) March 19, 2023
Such is the system of America, Australia, Britain and Canada.
Why the governments of these countries always keep a soft corner regarding the Khalistanis and why they do not take strict action against them. Senior journalist Vinod Shankar It is said that these countries put a lot of emphasis on freedom of expression. The culture there is such that even if you are protesting against the Prime Minister and the protest is non-violent, they don’t consider it too negative. This is their culture.
In the culture of South Asia, it is believed that the protest can turn violent at any time. However, the British government has not taken the issue of Britain very seriously. This is when Britain had already been warned on India’s side that the protest could also be violent. Despite this, the police did not pay attention in that way. The national flag was insulted by throwing stones during the protest. And many such things happened which no republican country would accept.
The negligence of America and Britain is clearly visible in this. This is the reason why the security has been reduced from the British High Commissioner’s office in Delhi in India. India has strongly protested by doing this. In such a situation, Britain needs to understand that if India with the largest population warns about something, then it needs to be taken seriously.
Source: www.tv9hindi.com”
