Calcutta High Court Justice Abhijit Gangopadhya on Tuesday warned of scrapping the panel of primary teachers appointed in 2016.
Image Credit source: File Photo
Calcutta High Court Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay of 2016 primary teacher recruitment Warned the entire panel to cancel the process. Due to this, the recruitment panel of 42 thousand 500 primary teachers can be cancelled. Let us inform that 140 untrained people without appointment High Court I have filed a case. They claim that the number division list has been published recently on the orders of the court. In that list it is seen that many untrained candidates got a job recommendation letter despite scoring less marks than him.
After that, Justice Gangopadhyay threatened to cancel the panel. Justice Gangopadhyay raised the matter of corruption in primary teacher recruitment on Tuesday and also raised the issue of Manik Bhattacharya, former chairman of the Board of Primary Education.
Calcutta High Court expressed displeasure on the board
The judge’s question was, “Did the plaintiffs not get the job because they did not have the power to reach Manik Bhattacharya?” In this case, the plaintiff wishes to present more information to the court with additional affidavits. Justice Gangopadhyay granted that permission. The next hearing of this matter will be on 16 December. Expressing his anger against the board, the judge said, “I also know how to pay all the sacrifices. He directed the litigants to summon many more documents.
Untrained candidates had filed a case in the High Court
In the recruitment process of 2016, 140 untrained candidates filed a case in the High Court. The hearing of the case took place on Tuesday. According to his claim, untrained candidates were appointed according to the rules of that year. The litigants told that in the recruitment process of 2016, about 32 thousand untrained candidates had received appointment letters. Recently, the Board of Primary Education had published the list by dividing the marks of the candidates on the instructions of the High Court.
Accused of giving recommendation letter despite getting less marks
Job seekers claim, the list shows that many untrained candidates got recommendation letters despite scoring less marks than them. The parties gave this information to the court. The judge ordered him to submit several more documents. The next hearing of this matter is on 16 December. Also, the plaintiff did not get the job as he did not have the power to reach Manik Bhattacharya, the judge claimed.
Source: www.tv9hindi.com”